PDA

View Full Version : Bowl Championship Series again open to change, resistant to playoff


obie7661
11-30-2006, 09:24 AM
By Jack Carey, USA TODAY
Bowl Championship Series coordinator Mike Slive said Wednesday that he remains "very open-minded" about looking at alternative formats to the BCS but there's no guarantee any other system will solve all of college football's postseason issues.
"There is not any format that does not have advantages or disadvantages," Slive said in a Wednesday conference call with members of the media. "Whatever we do, whether we keep it the way it is or whether we modify it, it won't be perfect."

This is the first year of a four-year agreement that sends the top two teams in the final BCS standings to a new championship game, apart from the four traditional BCS bowls.

This year's title game will be Jan. 8 in Glendale, Ariz. No. 1 Ohio State will be one participant in the game, with the other to be determined this weekend. If No. 2 Southern California beats UCLA, the Trojans are expected to advance. If they lose, No. 3 Michigan or fourth-rated Florida would go.

The final BCS standings will be announced Sunday along with the matchups for the Rose, Tostitos Fiesta, FedEx Orange and Allstate Sugar bowls.

Slive, the commissioner of the Southeastern Conference, saw Auburn from his league get shut out of a title-game appearance two years ago despite an undefeated season. This year, another highly ranked SEC team, Florida (11-1), probably also will be watching the title game, even if it beats Arkansas on Saturday for the SEC crown. Gators coach Urban Meyer has said it might be time for an eight-team playoff.

One of the alternatives Slive said he was open to looking at is called the "plus-one" model, whereby the top two teams in a post-bowl BCS standings would meet for the championship.

"If the idea is simply to have a 1-2 game, the BCS has done that," Slive said. "When we start looking at that ... and if 1-2 isn't enough, how many are enough?

"If (the present format) doesn't work ... each conference will have to make decisions about whether or not this format is the one we want to continue with."

Rosey sales:

In anticipation of a bid to a BCS game, LSU has collected 28,500 ticket requests for the Rose Bowl and 19,500 for the FedEx Orange Bowl. An SEC team has not played in the Rose since Alabama in 1946.

GrowlingTiger87
11-30-2006, 09:42 AM
Playoff, playoff, playoff. They need stinking playoffs.

longtimefirsttime
11-30-2006, 11:05 AM
Playoff, playoff, playoff. They need stinking playoffs.

I agree. Quit tinkering with a flawed system.

monte81
11-30-2006, 04:20 PM
Playoffs-- Teams are sitting around for 6 weeks waiting to play!! Take the top 8 teams and have a playoff!! Great for college football and keep the rest of the bowls!! Call the the 1st set qualifying games and play the rest as BCS semis played at the original bowl locations (Rose, orange, suger, and fiesta) and have the BCS championship game the last week just like its set up now!!!

Smitty
11-30-2006, 05:40 PM
Is a 4-team playoff enough?
Just considering THIS season... OSU, USC, Florida (assuming they beat Arkansas), and Michigan. Does anyone (besides Boise State) have a reason to complain? Oklahoma might be justified in howling and whinning.

SuperBran
12-01-2006, 10:52 AM
i would like to see a playoff, as it would be exciting to see the matchups that would occur each week. i think it would generate a lot more money then what comes in now.

the only problem is that you'd still wouldn't get rid of the complaints. if you take the top 8 teams for a tourny, then you're going to have complains on how those 8 were chosen....especially from number 9.

Obie Wan
12-01-2006, 08:34 PM
I'm tellling you guys: if Florida wins the SEC at 12-1 and gets passed over for the championship game after 12-0 Auburn got snubbed a couple of years ago, the SEC folks are going to be livid. You get one of the major conferences PO'd at the setup, and that's about the only thing that will get things moving.

The BCS is an incestuous crock as currently constituted, as it's designed more to keep all the money and glory within a few select conferences rather than to truly determine the best team(s).

GrowlingTiger87
12-01-2006, 11:19 PM
i would like to see a playoff, as it would be exciting to see the matchups that would occur each week. i think it would generate a lot more money then what comes in now.

the only problem is that you'd still wouldn't get rid of the complaints. if you take the top 8 teams for a tourny, then you're going to have complains on how those 8 were chosen....especially from number 9.


Are you REALLY ever going to get rid of complaints? Heck, all one has to do is look at the 65 team NCAA Tourney. Even though that many teams make it, some still end up feeling slighted. I say, just set some rules in stone for a playoff system, and live with it. I'm sick and tired of the Big Crock of S***