PDA

View Full Version : The records mean nothing


giant lugey
10-23-2006, 10:52 AM
Mck & Massillon records mean nothing when it comes down to this game. Most area observers have us as the under dog based on our records. But I tell you what:
If you replace Moellar with Lake – we’re 6-3
If you replace Mentor with Glen Oak – we’re 7-2
If you replace Iggy with Fitch – we’re 8-1
If you replace Warren with Hoover – we’re 9-0

We are the toughest team on Mck schedule.
Mckinley is just one of the tough teams on our schedule.

We are prepared. JUST DO IT!!!!!

TigerCarl
10-23-2006, 04:12 PM
Very astute observation.

Now, let's do it the other way around. What would McKINLEY's record be this year if they had played OUR schedule?

Well, the team from Arizona might just have dumped the Pups, and our beloved Canton bunch could be looking at a 4-5 record coming into the final contest of 2006, with a "must beat Massillon" scenario to eek their way into the playoff.

Don't get me wrong. McKinley is a very good team. But my instincts tell me that Massillon will put the whuppin' on the Bulldogs this year.

sly4458
10-23-2006, 06:26 PM
yea but they are 9-0 and we are 5-4 and the pups and most of stark county as a whole would love to see us sitting home next week when the playoffs start. and i for one am not ready for that. so TIGERS BRING YOUR A GAME FOR 4 QTRS!!!!!!! HEART AND DESIRE WILL WIN THIS ONE !!

MASSILLON ALWAYS!!!
GO TIGERS

DAWGH8R
10-23-2006, 07:52 PM
ditch the dogs !!!!

longtimefirsttime
10-24-2006, 01:26 AM
Don't get me wrong. McKinley is a very good team. But my instincts tell me that Massillon will put the whuppin' on the Bulldogs this year.

I hope you are in touch with your instincts. :thumbsup: